Company HBO I presented new posters depicting the main characters of the second season of adaptation The Last of Us and finally revealed the exact date of the premiere – the series will continue on April 13.
Total season has 7 episodes in which only part of The Last of US Part II will be disclosed . Showranners Craig Maine (Craig Mazin) and Neil Drakmann (Neil Druckmann) has repeatedly said that it would take more than one season to adapt the sequel. In addition, they intend to show on the screen some content cut out of the game.
On the main roles:
Events start 5 years after the end of the first season. Joel and Ellie settled in the Jackson commune and began to lead a more or less peaceful life from which new troubles tear them out.
On February 20, Ares joined the pantheon of the gods in the fresh update for Hades II
On February 20, Riot hopes that MMO on League of Legends will go to the flight of people on Mars
The Last of Us
The Last of Us: Part II
The best comments
I still can’t understand why it was necessary to repeat the plot of games in the series. You have a whole world, tell us the story of others of us how they survive in a cruel world. Their stories could intersect with Joel and Ellie and supplement them. Well, or expand the stories of existing characters. It was possible, for example, to talk about how Joel survived after Sarah or about Tommy and how Jackson originated. But no, they will once again tell us that revenge is bad.
I also thought at one time and think about the sequel games. The first ended so that in continuation the story of Ellie and (or) Joel no longer needed.
Jeremy Irons (holphist pun for the golf)
There were problems with the transfer of the main plot, and you make people invent new people.
If this is the most sparkling that you could come up with, then you have a fig with a sense of humor, people.
So the first game ended beautifully, the final is open, but clearly does not require continuation. Grandmas.
Nobody says anything in normal works, artistic techniques are used for this (for example, in the scene in the Torah in the basement of the medical center, when Ellie is ready to go to everything to take revenge on which monster it turned), the so -called artistic or movie language. “Installation from school” is when teachers tried to explain these artistic techniques, forcing you to write works with the analysis of the works so that you learn to read the real meaning. But you haven’t bought it along the way. Therefore, it turns out that you look only at moving pictures on the screen, a sort of analogue of shaking with keys in the face of the child, not even trying to see the depth, laid down by the author.
In terms of? The https://betyonercasino.co.uk/ second part is almost completely about this. This is the news about the second season, which will repeat the plot of the second part of the game
However, I talked with different people, and, as it turned out, there are direct fans of this approach – when the game is directly retold for word to word.
There are fans of any approach. I am sure there are those who want to cross the universes TLOU and Resident Evil. But the creators should not follow the fans. Perhaps this is the initial idea of Drakman to let in a bunch of different format processings of the same scenario (more precisely two scenarios). So you can release a book with a retelling of the plot of games, comics, a hill, a musical, etc.D. But all this is essentially trampling in one place and does not develop the game universe in any way.
Not immediately, did not throw it and did not insult.
Communication was delayed. It is pointless to drive from empty to empty, especially if you refuse to understand this. Reread one of my previous messages, maybe you will find an answer there.
I’ll just give a few examples.
In the film "Love and Pigeons" at the end there is a horse that pulls a cart. And many people considered that this was a metaphor and a hint of a bad choice of the main characters. What later the director denied – that no sense in this frame is not. He just took off because he considered it "beautifully"
Or another example of Balabanov. In the first film, he shot about a dangerous chloride killer and a victim of war – but people took him as a hero. And in his brother 2 Balabanov was generally surprised that people took the word “power in truth” literally, because the director is unwilling in these words and considers “power in truth” too naive and stupid.
To say and claim that the author wanted to say this in his product is strange. For xs that the author has in his head.
We can only.
The horse was in Athos. You would have checked at least at first. Balabanova, in principle, was surprised that the film was perceived in the forehead, and Danila as a Russian hero, although the film was shot against the backdrop of the success of the first part to simply collect money for more thoughtful projects of the director. You still forgot to give an example a meme about blue curtains, as an idea that sometimes the color of the curtains mean nothing. And all this should prove that there is no sense in a work of art? Interestingly, you also slept in literature lessons, considering teachers fools and this will not come in handy for you in life, and wrote off the works from the book of the 1000 best works?
How is that? Reflect on the meaning of years?)
Convey meaning and depth is one. To teach morality is another. I think that you are quite capable of distinguishing these things and understanding what I wrote above if you want.
Immediately rush into insults either. Do you believe or not, I (and to everyone practically) are quite friendly, except that the Internet is not able to convey this tone in the text, alas.
The second part is not about that.
Not all stories try to teach you something, leave this approach in fables for children, all this is moralization and the search for meanings. Stories are just stories. They show you and tell you … stories. Which happened to someone or something. In artistic works, the task of grabbing your attention is still worth it and offer you the opportunity to survive something in a safe environment for you.
The second part of TLOU tells you the story of revenge Ellie, at the same time showing its path from the other side. Everything in this game works on this story. And if the author did not directly say to you “with this work, I want to say that A is bad and B is good,” then you should not think what the author wanted to say there, because you will guess the hell.
In general, people are often trying to look for meanings and morality in other people’s stories, and I don’t understand-it is from school or something that has remained or from where it is getting from.
In general, I agree (except for the last sentence, there is no such thought in the game). Therefore, I am the third series of the first season and put it above the rest, since at least she showed at least something that I did not see in the game. And the rest is not only in the game, but it was even better played there and delivered.
However, I talked with different people, and, as it turned out, there are direct fans of this approach – when the game is directly retold for word to word.
Immediately after you understand the difference between moralizing and scenario/operator/staged/game design/other techniques designed to convey the author’s idea.
For example TLOU2:
"Revenge is bad" is moralization. Moralizing, which are not in the game. No one teaches the player and does not teach life. There was no such task.
“For Ellie, the pursuit of revenge turned into devastation, the loss of everything that was expensive for her and, ultimately, by accepting” – this is a thought from the scenario of the game, and all techniques in the game are aimed at opening and transmitting to the player.
These are two radically different entities, they do not need to be thrown into one heap.
Well, it’s not my fiu. Stay there! Perhaps this is curable.
The second part is a continuous shame on the studio and Drarkman personally, another series will be shot on this under -awareness, a nail in the coffin so to speak.